Section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter) states that “veryone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.” According to the Supreme Court of Canada, the purpose of this provision is to “protect individual liberty against unlawful state interference.” To assess whether the provision has been violated, a court will ask two questions:
Question 1: Was the individual detained or imprisoned by the state?
There are two types of detention: physical and psychological.
Physical detention or imprisonment is typically clear and includes things like being handcuffed, placed in a police car, or put in a prison cell.
Psychological detention occurs in two scenarios:
An example of the first scenario of psychological detention would be when a person is pulled over by the police while driving. In R v Grant, the second scenario occurred when three police officers cornered and questioned an individual walking down a street.
Question 2: Was the detention or imprisonment arbitrary?
If a court finds that a person was detained or imprisoned, the next question it will ask is whether the detention or imprisonment was arbitrary. Arbitrariness will not exist if three criteria are satisfied:
If the detention or imprisonment fails to satisfy any one of these criteria, then the court will find the detention to be arbitrary.
Detention triggers section 10
Once a person is subject to an arrest or detention under the above test, that person’s section 10 rights under the Charter become engaged. These rights include (among others): the right to reasons for detention or imprisonment, and the right to counsel.
Section 9 rights are limited
As with all rights under the Charter, a person’s section 9 rights are subject to limitation under section 1. Section 1 of the Charter states that the government can legally impose “reasonable limits” on an individual’s Charter rights, provided that those limits are “prescribed by law” and can be “demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.”