We're delighted to announce the publication of a new podcast miniseries, produced by the Centre's 2026 summer students and published as episodes 7, 8, and 9 of the Centre's main podcast (The 7/50 Podcast). The new miniseries is called "Yes, No, I Don't Know," and provides analysis of some of the key questions on the ballot in Alberta's upcoming referendum on October 19, 2026. It was produced by Alexis Vander Linden, Claire Adam, and Kiera Fischer, all of whom are currently law students at the University of Alberta. You can listen to the first two episodes below, with a third to follow on Friday.
We're excited to announce the rollout of a new flagship CCS podcast, The 7/50 Podcast.
In the past, the Centre has published a variety of thematically distinct podcast miniseries, including our recent student series on the notwithstanding clause, Clause for Concern? Notwithstanding Canada's Charter.
This new series, by contrast, is much broader in scope. In short, the series will host conversations with leading scholars and lawyers about a wide range of current Canadian constitutional debates, from debates over the balance of power between Canada's federal and provincial governments to debates over how to interpret our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
In the first season of the podcast, we keep things close to our institutional home by reflecting on Alberta's constitutional politics, culminating in a breakdown of some of the ballot questions that will feature in the province's October 2026 referendum. Our first guest in episode 1, Chantal Hebert (CBC's The National, Toronto Star) discusses some of the burning questions surrounding the Alberta sovereignty movement, including its relationship with the Quebec sovereignty movement and the roles that might be played by different actors (e.g. Indigenous communities, the Government of Canada) if discussions about AB sovereignty move further forward.
***
Special thanks go to the Centre's 2025 and 2026 summer students: Alexis Vander Linden, Areeba Ismail, Claire Adam, Kiera Fischer, Maria Kalapurayil, and Nicole Ibalio. The new series wouldn't have been possible without many months of hard work from each of them, and without their shared commitment to public education on constitutional issues.
You can listen to The 7/50 Podcast wherever you get your podcasts, including via Apple and Spotify. You can now listen to episodes 1 to 6 below, and you can access the series homepage here: The 7/50 Podcast
The Centre is pleased to announce the publication of a new open issue of the Review of Constitutional Studies. Issue 30.1 contains articles by Claire Charters, Félix Mathieu & Dave Guénette, Keith Cherry, Sarah Burningham, Stéphanie Chouinard & Emmanuelle Richez, and Adriano Zambon. The full issue can be accessed via Heinonline (link below) and will be available open access one year after publication.
Full Issue: https://access.heinonline.com/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/revicos30&i=1

The Centre is pleased to announce the publication of a new open issue of our journal, Constitutional Forum. You can access the full issue for free by clicking the links below. Thank you to Jamie Cameron, Robert Diab, Ian Peach, Navya Sheth, and Erin Masters for contributing to this latest issue.
FULL ISSUE: CONSTITUTIONAL FORUM, 35.1
Working Families v Ontario: Toward a Principle of Voter Agency
Jamie Cameron
1-18
Is There a Constitutional Right to a Human Decision in Canada?
Robert Diab
19-32
How the Building Canada Act Reveals the Weakness of the Mikisew Cree First Nation v Canada Decision
Ian Peach
33-46
Get Off My Lawn! Applying Charter Values to the Tort of Trespass
Navya Sheth
47-66
Canada’s Antibodies to the Donald Trump Virus (and Its Immunodeficiencies)
Erin Masters
67-80
In this special issue, guest edited by Dax D'Orazio (Guelph) and Michael Asres (York), scholars of law and politics at different career stages examine some of the key legal, political, and practical challenges raised by Canada's Online Harms Bill (Bill C-63), which died on the order paper when Parliament was prorogued in early 2025. In anticipation of subsequent attempts to regulate online harms, the issue's contributors reflect on how the law ought to respond to the rapid spread of hateful or otherwise harmful content online, and on how this response can be tailored to still leave ample room for the exercise of expressive freedom. You can access the full issue for free by clicking the individual article links below.
FULL ISSUE: REGULATING ONLINE HARMS IN CANADA
Editorial Introduction: Regulating Online Harms in Canada
Michael Asres, Dax D'Orazio
i-viii
Online Harms Legislation and Lawful but Awful Expression
Emily Laidlaw
1-20
Protecting Us and They/Them: The Online Harms Act as a Missed Opportunity for Queer Expressive Freedom under the Charter
Joe Byram
21-42
Beyond Public Law: Recognizing a Tort Remedy for Hate Speech in Canada
Kenneth Grad
43-64
A New Life for Section 13 of the CHRA?
Richard Moon
65-72
Hate Speech in the Headlines: National Newspaper Coverage of Free Expression Controversies and the Human Rights Backlash
Michael Asres, Dax D'Orazio
73-94
Online Harms and Hate Speech: The United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act as a Model for Canada
Emmett Macfarlane
95-104
We're delighted to announce the publication of a new special issue of the Constitutional Forum. This special issue comprises a series of short commentaries on the Ontario Court of Appeal's recent judgment in Fair Voting BC v Canada (Attorney General), in which the Court rejected claims that Canada's "first-past-the-post" electoral system unjustifiably violates sections 3 and 15(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the right to vote and the right to equality). You can access the full issue for free via the links below.
CONSTITUTIONAL FORUM: 34.3 (Special Issue: Fair Voting BC)
***
***
Fair Voting BC: The Charter, Courts, and Election Law
Léonid Sirota
Nothing to See Here: Sex Discrimination and the Challenge to “First Past the Post” in Fair Voting BC
Kerri Froc
The Application of the Charter to Legislation Unilaterally Amending the Constitution of Canada under Section 44 of the Constitution Act, 1982
Michael Pal & Sujit Choudhry