Volume 26.1 (2017)
Publication: Constitutional Forum
Published January 1, 2017 |
Constitutional Forum
Share This Constitutional Forum
Volume 26.1 – National Receivership Law; Atlantic Canada & Reference Re Supreme Court Act; Reforming Rowbotham & State-Funded Counsel
This issue of the Forum includes articles on the evolution of national receivership law, the regional considerations in Supreme Court of Canada appointments, and moving towards fairer standards for state-funded counsel.
The Incremental Evolution of National Receivership Law and the Elusive Search for Federal Purpose
Roderick Wood
Reference Re Supreme Court Act: Atlantic Canada and Regional Considerations in Supreme Court of Canada Appointments
Ian A McIsaac
Reforming Rowbotham: Towards Fairer Financial Eligibility Standards for State-Funded Counsel in Criminal Trial
Manasvin Goswami (Veenu)
ccslaw admin2020-07-30T16:03:03-06:00
Related Posts
-
Constitutional Forum
In this issue: Toronto's 2018 Municipal Election, Rights of Democratic Participation, and Section 2(b) of the Charter; Restricting Freedom of Peaceful Assembly During Public Health Emergencies
March 5th, 2021
-
Constitutional Forum
In this issue: The Toronto Municipal Election: Judicial Failure to Protect the Structure of the Canadian Constitution; Do Consumers Really Benefit from the Federal Paramountcy Doctrine? A Critique of Director of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions v Telus Communications Inc.; Constitutionalism and the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act Reference
October 4th, 2020
-
Constitutional Forum
This special issue deals with campus free speech and was edited by professors Kate Bezanson and Alison Braley-Rattai.
April 13th, 2020
-
Constitutional Forum
In this issue: Seeing Double: Peace, Order, and Good Government, and the Impact of Federal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Legislation on Provincial Jurisdiction; Charter Injunctions, Public Interest Presumption, and the Tyranny of the Majority; The Conscientious Objection of Medical Practitioners to the CPSO’s “Effective Referral” Requirement; Nothing to Declare: A Response to Grégoire Webber, Eric Mendelsohn, Robert Leckey, and Léonid Sirota on the Effects of the Notwithstanding Clause
April 12th, 2020
