Balancing Rights (section 1)

July 4, 2019
image_pdf
image_print

Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms reflects the basic principle that individual rights and freedoms cannot be absolute and that, in some circumstances, they must be limited by the state in order to protect competing rights or the interests of the community as a whole. Section 1 provides that Charter rights are “subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.” In its 1986 decision in R. v. Oakes ( 1 S.C.R. 103), the Supreme Court of Canada set out a general framework for deciding whether a law or other form of government action found to violate a Charter right can nevertheless be justified under section 1.

This balancing rights test became known as the Oakes Test. First, the government entity responsible for the individual rights violation must show that its objectives are “of sufficient importance to warrant overriding a constitutionally protected right.” Next, the government must demonstrate that the means it has adopted to achieve those objectives are rational; that they impair the right in question as little as possible; and that the benefits achieved outweigh the harm which results from the rights violation. Limits upheld by the court under section 1 include restrictions on freedom of expression under the pornography and the hate propaganda (see R. v. Butler, 1 S.C.R. 452 and R. v. Keegstra, 3 S.C.R. 697, respectively) and provisions of the Criminal Code (R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46). Examples of rights violations that have failed section 1 scrutiny include restrictions on freedom of expression under provincial sign language laws (see Ford v. Quebec(A.G.), 2 S.C.R. 712) and under federal tobacco control legislation (see RJR-MacDonald Inc. v.Canada (A.G.), 3 S.C.R. 199).

Sources:

  • R.J. Sharpe & K.E. Swinton, “Limitation of Charter Rights” in R.J. Sharpe & K.E. Swinton, The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Toronto: Irwin Law, 1998) 42.

Subscribe

Protection of Privacy – Personal information provided is collected in accordance with Section 33(c) of the Alberta Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the FOIP Act) and will be protected under Part 2 of that Act. It will be used for the purpose of managing CCS’ email subscription lists. Should you require further information about collection, use and disclosure of personal information, or to unsubscribe, please contact: Administrator, Centre for Constitutional Studies, 448D Law Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, T6G 2H5, Tel: 780-492-5681, Email: ccslaw@ualberta.ca. You may unsubscribe from our email lists at any time.
Centre for Constitutional Studies
448D Law Centre
University of Alberta
Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5
chevron-down