Hays-Joyal Committee

July 4, 2019

After talks among the eleven First Ministers, which commenced in 1976, failed to produce an agreement on a new Canadian Constitution, or even agreement on how to patriate the Constitution, the federal government announced its own unilateral proposals on the subject.[1] It then appointed a Special Joint Committee of the House of Commons to consult with Canadians about the proposals. Created in October 1980 and chaired by Senator Dan Hays and MP Serge Joyal, this Committee sat through 267 hours of hearings over fifty-six days, all subject to televised scrutiny.[2] The Committee’s recommendations played a part in significant amendments to the initial proposals for constitutional reform placed before it by the federal government. Some of the changes that resulted from the Committee’s hearings and recommendations included:

  • A preamble to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that included a reference to the “Supremacy of God”;
  • An added section to the Charter that expressly guaranteed equal Charter rights to men and women (section 28);
  • Constitutional recognition and affirmation of existing Aboriginal rights (now section 35); and
  • The inclusion of mental and physical disability as prohibited grounds of discrimination in section 15 of the Charter (see equality rights).[3]

Notably, among the changes considered, but not included in either the Committee’s recommendations or the new Constitution were:

  • A recognition of property rights; and
  • Inclusion of sexual orientation as a prohibited ground of discrimination under section 15 of the Charter.[4]

It has been argued that because of the invitation to the public to participate in the constitutional process, the hearings of the Committee marked the passing of a point of no return. An expectation of public consultation in the process of constitutional reform was created and would affect the ways in which future constitutional change could occur.[5]

[1] Edward McWhinney, Canada and the Constitution, 1979-1982: Patriation and the Charter of Rights (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018) at 11–12, 42–49.

[2] Ibid at 49–51.

[3] Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss 28, 15, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 ; Constitution Act, 1982, s 35, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11; McWhinney, supra note 1 at 58–60.

[4] McWhinney, supra note 1 at 58.

[5] Barbara Perry, “The role of popular mobilizations in the struggle for the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms” (1995) 22 Crim L & Soc Change 183 at 188–191, 204–209; Bruce P Elman, "Altering the Judicial Mind and the Process of Constitution-Making in Canada" (1990) 28:2 Alta L Rev 521 at 531–532.

Subscription Form


Protection of Privacy – Personal information provided is collected in accordance with Section 33(c) of the Alberta Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (the FOIP Act) and will be protected under Part 2 of that Act. It will be used for the purpose of managing CCS’ email subscription lists. Should you require further information about collection, use and disclosure of personal information, or to unsubscribe, please contact: Administrator, Centre for Constitutional Studies, 448D Law Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, T6G 2H5, Tel: 780-492-5681, Email: ccslaw@ualberta.ca. You may unsubscribe from our email lists at any time.
Centre for Constitutional Studies
448D Law Centre
University of Alberta
Edmonton, AB T6G 2H5
chevron-down linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram